Episode 19

full
Published on:

4th Jun 2025

Johanna Stadlbauer on boundaries, agency, and community building (CAL125, S6 E19)

Johanna Stadlbauer is an anthropologist working in researcher development at the University of Graz, recently made Head of Research Careers Campus Graz. Her mission is a more fun and kind academia. Johanna shares the experiences and challenges of her journey from a PhD to quitting a postdoc in anthropology, to doing NGO work part-time, and then coming back to academia for a researcher development role. Her work now is focused on creating a supportive and kind academic environment, with the aim to improve researcher well-being and foster a sense of community. She discusses establishing structures for postdoctoral researchers' support and community, and highlights initiatives like the writing retreat, Fiasco Fest, and peer mentoring, which aim to improve researcher well-being and foster a sense of community. Johanna is a role model for how to navigate a career path and your work role on your own terms. She is really clear on her own boundaries, and what she needs to feed herself and look after her work-life balance. She also reminds us the value of peer support, of telling people their contributions matter, and of taking the time to savour the good. She reminds us of the significance of agency, community support, and the need for transparency and understanding in academia.

00:00 CAL125 Johanna Stadlbauer

03:03 Introduction and Guest Background

03:56 Journey from Anthropology to Research Development

06:18 Postdoc Experience and Challenges

07:42 Deciding to Quit the PostDoc

12:05 Transition to NGO Work

15:57 Finding Balance and Setting Boundaries

19:47 Messaging in Academia

23:35 Permanent Contract and Current Role

29:27 Towards a Fun and Kind Academia and Experiences of Power Abuse

31:26 Finding Solutions and Positive Structures

33:31 Balancing Critique and Support in Academia

35:58 Empowering Postdocs and Addressing Structural Issues

40:12 The Importance of Community, Peer Support and Mentoring

49:39 Promoting Good Working Environments for Researcher Wellbeing

52:03 Personal Reflections and Final Thoughts

56:53 End 

Related Links

Johanna's web page (English version)

Head of Research Careers Campus Graz 

Researcher Development in Graz Blog 

LinkedIn pages for Johanna, the PostDoc Office, and Research Careers Campus Graz

The Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA

Max Planck PhD Net 

Balint Group Method 

Transcript
Speaker:

Welcome to Changing Academic Life.

Speaker:

I'm Geraldine Fitzpatrick, and this is a podcast series where academics and

Speaker:

others share their stories, provide ideas, and provoke discussions about what

Speaker:

we can do individually and collectively to change academic life for the better.

Speaker:

On your own terms.

Speaker:

That's not just a platitude, it's how Johanna Stadlbauer has

Speaker:

navigated her career to date.

Speaker:

I have the pleasure of presenting this conversation with Johanna's,

Speaker:

an anthropologist by background, and currently heading up researcher

Speaker:

development at the University of Graz, where she's head of the

Speaker:

research careers campus Graz.

Speaker:

Johanna has a really interesting journey herself from a PhD and a postdoc in

Speaker:

anthropology, to then deciding to quit the postdoc because it wasn't working for her.

Speaker:

She then talks about working with various NGOs and doing that work part-time because

Speaker:

of the health issues that had resulted from previous work experiences, and then

Speaker:

how she eventually came back to academia for this researcher development role.

Speaker:

So her work now is squarely focused on creating a supportive

Speaker:

and kind academic environment.

Speaker:

She talks about how they're working to establish various structures for

Speaker:

supporting postdoctoral researchers and for helping to create community.

Speaker:

And this includes initiatives like a writing retreat and a fiasco

Speaker:

fest that I really loved, and various peer mentoring initiatives.

Speaker:

All with the aim of creating better workplaces that will result in improving

Speaker:

research and researcher wellbeing, and also fostering that sense of community.

Speaker:

I think Johanna is a role model herself for how to navigate a career path with

Speaker:

integrity and authenticity and resilience and defining work on your own terms.

Speaker:

She's really clear on her own boundaries and what she needs to do to feed herself

Speaker:

and to look after her own wellbeing.

Speaker:

And this conversation reminds us of the value of peer support, of clear

Speaker:

communication, of telling people their contributions matter, that they matter,

Speaker:

and to take time to savor the good.

Speaker:

She also reminds us that we all do have some agency to

Speaker:

define work on our own terms.

Speaker:

Enjoy this conversation with Johanna.

Speaker:

Johanna, thank you so much for joining me and I'm going to read

Speaker:

the first little paragraph from your webpage 'cause it says, I'm an

Speaker:

anthropologist working in researcher development at the University of Graz.

Speaker:

I'm head of the research careers campus and my mission is a

Speaker:

more fun and kind academia.

Speaker:

So those strands point to what I'd really love to explore with you.

Speaker:

First of all, what's the journey that brought you from anthropology

Speaker:

to working in researcher development?

Speaker:

Thank you, Geraldine.

Speaker:

It's an honor because I really like your podcast and, it's

Speaker:

called Changing Academic Life.

Speaker:

So I think that's something we are both, invested in our own

Speaker:

ways and maybe even both as, with a love for anthropology as well.

Speaker:

And it's a big question, how does one go from anthropology

Speaker:

to a researcher development?

Speaker:

And I try to answer it now, but I always, feel or I have the

Speaker:

conviction that an anthropology degree prepares you for every role.

Speaker:

And it's an asset to have in, every job.

Speaker:

Because I have so many friends who studied with me who, use their anthropology

Speaker:

skills in, I don't know, in the innovation sector, in the business sector.

Speaker:

Many different roles.

Speaker:

And personally, I like to work with people who are very curious about humans.

Speaker:

And very aware of society and how, it shapes, and it's stratified like

Speaker:

how gender roles in society shape how we interact with each other, how,

Speaker:

class and, our family background, shapes our pathways and, all the

Speaker:

different discriminations there are.

Speaker:

So I think that's, that's an asset to have in any kind of job.

Speaker:

And personally, I came into researcher development via equality work.

Speaker:

And I came to equality work via doing gender studies in anthropology.

Speaker:

I have a background in thinking about methods as well in anthropology.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

that comes in handy if you can do qualitative research.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

what needs your target group have If you are serving a specific target group, you

Speaker:

know how to, find out, what they want and.

Speaker:

Through my previous roles.

Speaker:

I also know how to make a program and I know, how to develop offers, how to

Speaker:

make a concept for something and how to evaluate it and see if it has an impact.

Speaker:

So that's the short of it.

Speaker:

I love that you've just talked about really clear skills, ways of thinking.

Speaker:

that can be transferable in lots of different, domains.

Speaker:

the fact that you've brought it here.

Speaker:

What about the decision process to get Into researcher development?

Speaker:

So did you do, you did a PhD in anthropology in, at Graz.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And did you do postdoc research?

Speaker:

How was that postdoc journey?

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So I studied in Graz and I, did some field work.

Speaker:

So for my, MA I did some field work in New Zealand, which

Speaker:

I've told you about previously.

Speaker:

It's roughly the area where,

Speaker:

it's roughly near Australia and a long way away.

Speaker:

In that it's quite a bit, quite far away from Austria.

Speaker:

And, for my PhD, I did field work in Austria with expatriates.

Speaker:

So people who were here for short term work stays.

Speaker:

So two, three years, four years, two years, and were very mobile.

Speaker:

had a life of, going to different companies around the world.

Speaker:

And, I caught them at the time where they were in Austria.

Speaker:

And after that, a new anthropology professor from Germany came to

Speaker:

Carinthia and, they, he wanted someone from Austria to familiarize him

Speaker:

with the Austrian academic cultures.

Speaker:

And so I got that job.

Speaker:

And so I did a postdoc for two years, in Carinthia, which is

Speaker:

a, it's a great university.

Speaker:

Everyone is really friendly there.

Speaker:

And I was let into all the working groups for equality and, my own

Speaker:

qualitative research network and so on.

Speaker:

But, after two years out of a six year contract, I realized,

Speaker:

This is, too strenuous.

Speaker:

So I have too little inspiration, for research projects.

Speaker:

And I have, too high workloads because I was also responsible

Speaker:

for the curricular development.

Speaker:

So I had to plan the department's teaching program for the year and, give all

Speaker:

the students their degrees basically.

Speaker:

And so I had students in my office all the time.

Speaker:

But, yes, but that wasn't

Speaker:

That sounds like a lot to ask of a first, second year out postdoc.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

But at that time it was only me and my boss, at the department,

Speaker:

and of course a brilliant secretary who was basically doing my job.

Speaker:

I, did a lot of it, but she had the institutional knowledge.

Speaker:

that was brilliant.

Speaker:

I'm just curious, if the role had have been less of the teaching curriculum

Speaker:

development and more space for research, do you, could you imagine, I know it's

Speaker:

imagining a world that didn't happen, but could you imagine that you may have been

Speaker:

able to get inspiration for research?

Speaker:

It might have been.

Speaker:

I had more brain space.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

But that's still something I'm very proud of.

Speaker:

I even advocated for myself, I went to the vice director for staff and told

Speaker:

him that this is untenable, and then he reduced my teaching, which was, useful.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

and,

Speaker:

but I, just really lacked, I was in a slump after the PhD, basically, as is

Speaker:

apparently normal in academic careers.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Who am I now?

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

I didn't have between conferences, my boss telling me I need to apply for third party

Speaker:

funding this, curriculum development.

Speaker:

I had no inspiration for any sort of direction I wanted

Speaker:

to go in with my research.

Speaker:

I started a project, but I abandoned it gladly.

Speaker:

After I quit that job.

Speaker:

I always had this, question in the back of my mind, is that right for me?

Speaker:

And so I went to therapy and talked about with the therapist

Speaker:

and said, I can't make this work.

Speaker:

Everyone is saying you need to work 60 hours.

Speaker:

I cannot work 60 hours and I don't want it.

Speaker:

And he said, then find your own way to do it.

Speaker:

And then I just quit.

Speaker:

So

Speaker:

That's, that's brave.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

But it's, yeah, I've, talked this through with colleagues and some of them said, the

Speaker:

whole university basically said it's brave because it's a very small university.

Speaker:

So it was, I got lots of calls saying, why did you quit from

Speaker:

the team, upwards and downwards.

Speaker:

And everyone was applauding me a little bit for this decision.

Speaker:

But I had a boyfriend then who had his own flat.

Speaker:

And so I had a secure financial background.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

In that sense.

Speaker:

And I was then able to have a job for one or two years where

Speaker:

I earned only 1,300 Euros.

Speaker:

So by having this living space basically, and

Speaker:

I had the feedback from other people who aren't as financially secure in

Speaker:

academia, that it's actually not that brave, and who are still in academia

Speaker:

because that's the only way they can have an income for the whole family.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

which is that parents, sister and so on.

Speaker:

It's hard, isn't it?

Speaker:

And the, trade offs and, the circumstances, they're not easy decisions.

Speaker:

If you didn't have that safety net, maybe you couldn't have done it and you

Speaker:

would, would've been like some other people, as you just said, who stayed on,

Speaker:

then there's the cost of that untenable.

Speaker:

Yeah, I, I would still have done it pretty, yeah.

Speaker:

Because if you just have too much then, or you can't make it work then.

Speaker:

I've always been taught by my mother to leave things behind and

Speaker:

she has modeled that basically.

Speaker:

And so that's always my approach.

Speaker:

if it's more sad making than is happy making, then I'm not doing it.

Speaker:

so I'm a bit uncompromising in that.

Speaker:

But it's, important to recognize also that, privilege that not everyone has

Speaker:

when they make the career decisions.

Speaker:

And then I thankfully found lots of different jobs through none of them

Speaker:

through, regular applications, but through networks that I already had.

Speaker:

so one woman from Carinthia knew, a man in Graz who ran, run an

Speaker:

NGO for youth and equality work.

Speaker:

And so I worked with him for a year on a project on antisemitism that

Speaker:

was, From funded from a political, education body and from the municipality.

Speaker:

that was also a time when I had many health issues, I think, due to

Speaker:

having been so stressed out earlier.

Speaker:

So at that time, a chronic illness manifested itself.

Speaker:

So I had a 15 hour job and I was able to go there, and do all of it,

Speaker:

and still be very chronically ill.

Speaker:

but that thankfully, got better over time and these mini NGO contracts were

Speaker:

quite good for that because I didn't have to be in the office all the time.

Speaker:

Nice.

Speaker:

So Nice.

Speaker:

And that gave me the start into this NGO work, NGO research education

Speaker:

work, where you do needs analysis.

Speaker:

And then prepare educational concepts from them with this specific

Speaker:

background was antisemitism prevention.

Speaker:

and then I moved through a woman who works at the university or

Speaker:

worked at the University of Graz in the equality office for 30 years.

Speaker:

I think she connected me with another NGO, which is the Männer Beratung in Graz.

Speaker:

So the men's counseling center also, decades old institution,

Speaker:

which has a research path, which is also quite old already.

Speaker:

And they do lots of EU Daphne violence preventative grants.

Speaker:

So they apply for grants a lot and have about 10 to 15 ongoing projects,

Speaker:

which are funded by the EU or by different health, funding bodies or

Speaker:

by municipality, province and so on.

Speaker:

Or even by people who contract them for,

Speaker:

institutions that have a problem with violence, or sexual abuse, for

Speaker:

example, and need them to come in and do research and then find out

Speaker:

how to make the institution better.

Speaker:

I got that connection and they took me on, in five different research,

Speaker:

project projects in a 15 hour contract.

Speaker:

So that was, lots of business trips nicely.

Speaker:

So I got to go, I got to go to Sofia and to Southern Tyrol, and to,

Speaker:

Barcelona for all these EU projects.

Speaker:

Nice.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Very good.

Speaker:

But all of them were on the topic of, preventing sexual abuse against boys.

Speaker:

Or sexualized violence, and discrimination against boys and training people

Speaker:

who work with children to create an environment where these children can

Speaker:

tell them that this is happening.

Speaker:

So I did that for three years until I couldn't take it anymore because

Speaker:

that's also a job where you would need a lot of community with your

Speaker:

colleagues and a lot of, supervision.

Speaker:

And through this third party funding, framework, there wasn't really a lot of

Speaker:

time to spend time with the colleagues, in the office because it was, the

Speaker:

colleagues were all over Europe basically.

Speaker:

And, the people who headed the institute also had quite bit on their plate.

Speaker:

So I quit that then, and that there we come to 2020.

Speaker:

so that's just, another example of you being very reflective

Speaker:

of what's going on for me.

Speaker:

What do I need, what's working for me now and when is it not working anymore?

Speaker:

And time to go.

Speaker:

Like your mother.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Role model again.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And by that time I also had this chronic illness, so that taught me never

Speaker:

to do more than I think I can take.

Speaker:

Because I really, I. So that manifested in 2016 and then, in 2020, I was

Speaker:

still, so much in the throes of it that I always stated my boundaries

Speaker:

very clearly to every employer.

Speaker:

And I'm also really proud of, I've had, to, while I was working at the NGOI was

Speaker:

also working at the German University remotely to do also violence prevention.

Speaker:

And I, that was a, I think four month, six month remote contract.

Speaker:

And.

Speaker:

I did a curative retreat during that because in the Austrian state

Speaker:

you can go on curative retreats, so for the chronic illness.

Speaker:

So I had a job in Germany, in the German system and a job in Austria, both

Speaker:

of them part-time and partly remote.

Speaker:

And I told everyone, I'm now going on this curative retreat because I need it.

Speaker:

And I somehow made it work through all that administration and both

Speaker:

employers were just happy with it.

Speaker:

And yeah.

Speaker:

So I was, basically on a journey since 2016 to tell everyone my

Speaker:

boundaries and the conditions under which I want to work and, that's good.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

You said, the people made it work or were happy with it.

Speaker:

And you also, when you said before that you quit the first postdoc

Speaker:

job and So many people said, why?

Speaker:

and in the end were supportive in that.

Speaker:

Were you surprised by people support, were you anticipating more pushback or that

Speaker:

people would not want you to be holding your boundaries and, do what they wanted?

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

yeah, I was neither surprised, nor did I anticipate that it

Speaker:

would be un uncomfortable.

Speaker:

Obviously my boss very much when he brought me on as a postdoc saw himself

Speaker:

in the role as supporting my career.

Speaker:

And looking back, I can understand everything he did

Speaker:

as trying to be supportive.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

When I was, only 30 and not have, not having been in academia for

Speaker:

very long, I didn't recognize it.

Speaker:

And I recognized it more as him putting pressure on me and reacted as such.

Speaker:

And, in that sense, I obviously, I felt very bad about quitting

Speaker:

this job after two years and he.

Speaker:

He was all on the journey with me for a long time.

Speaker:

In fact, in that talk where I told him I quit, he said he would try

Speaker:

to negotiate a development contract for me to keep me on for longer.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And I just said, no thank you.

Speaker:

And then obviously he told me, then I'm not going to support you anymore, which.

Speaker:

Also wasn't necessary, but I managed, despite being so strong with my

Speaker:

boundaries, I think everyone, remembers me not in a, adversarial manner.

Speaker:

So he, still called me up two years later to ask, can I come back for half a year?

Speaker:

Because someone has just gone on.

Speaker:

Oh, nice.

Speaker:

Yeah, it's nice.

Speaker:

So it's a just, a good message that you can hold your

Speaker:

boundaries and make that work.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

I think if you're generally a nice person to work with.

Speaker:

Yeah, And respectful of the people and, to let them know

Speaker:

it's also, yeah.

Speaker:

It's also just interesting, for people who are in leadership roles

Speaker:

or employing people like postdocs, that tension of wanting to support

Speaker:

people's career development.

Speaker:

And recognizing the pressures of the current environment

Speaker:

and system that we're in.

Speaker:

And often that does, this inadvertently translate into some pressures to

Speaker:

play the game more and work the long hours and tick all the boxes and

Speaker:

on that, if I had just had more knowledge about how academia works,

Speaker:

and if he had just explained, why he wants me to do this, that and the

Speaker:

other, and in what way this would contribute to my path, I might have

Speaker:

understood and not rejected it so much.

Speaker:

so he just said, you Johanna now it's time, you're on the six year contract

Speaker:

to apply for third party funding.

Speaker:

And I just didn't understand.

Speaker:

I didn't understand that I now needed to be the PI of my own project

Speaker:

and I need to develop leadership and I need to go out there with

Speaker:

my own ideas and be independent.

Speaker:

And he also explained none of it.

Speaker:

And there was also no structure in place, like a postdoc office or,

Speaker:

something that would have drawn me in to explain me these things somehow.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And he didn't really do much explaining because all of them in that generation,

Speaker:

they all learned by doing basically.

Speaker:

And I tried for the longest time to just model what everyone

Speaker:

else was doing without really understanding why they were doing it.

Speaker:

Going to lots of conferences.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

That's good.

Speaker:

Not really having an intention behind it other than that

Speaker:

I saw what they were doing.

Speaker:

And then, you have your people who stand up in front of, training for women,

Speaker:

career training for women, and say, you're going to work on the weekends.

Speaker:

It's going to be hard.

Speaker:

And so all of these messages I took on board and thought, okay, some people say

Speaker:

this, so some people must also do this.

Speaker:

And where do I fit in that?

Speaker:

And that was, also what led me to quit because I thought, if there's no one

Speaker:

else who does it like I do it, who does it to my abilities with weekends and

Speaker:

family time and, friends and going to the sauna and stuff like that, then

Speaker:

how am I going to do this and how am, how will I be where I need to be

Speaker:

with all these impermanent contracts?

Speaker:

And yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah, but all of that was solved very quickly after I, I left this

Speaker:

job because despite having then these many, contract jobs, I, felt there's

Speaker:

so many people who want my skills and they are also appreciative.

Speaker:

And the NGO world, is not shy with giving praise.

Speaker:

then the, then academia was for me, and there's not a reviewer, around every

Speaker:

corner who you have to network with.

Speaker:

There's just people who are happy for the mission, wanting to end violence, or

Speaker:

wanting to engage youth or, wanting the world to be a much better place and they

Speaker:

celebrate everyone who comes on board basically, despite the obviously funding

Speaker:

situation being shit and stressing.

Speaker:

But, they, yeah, even that equality office in Germany, they were, really,

Speaker:

really appreciative and said, so nice that you are here with your skills.

Speaker:

And just, took me with my remote contract and I got to meet

Speaker:

everyone in the university because I did a project on preventing

Speaker:

sexualized harassment on campus.

Speaker:

So I had to do interviews with everyone from the president, to it

Speaker:

service to all the dean and so on.

Speaker:

And they just, welcomed me, as the strange Austrian.

Speaker:

And so lots of healing experiences after academia.

Speaker:

Ah, good.

Speaker:

And, This stress about temporary contracts resolved itself a bit by me thinking, ah,

Speaker:

okay, I have something that actually is in demand, or there are things happening

Speaker:

for me and I have a good network.

Speaker:

but that doesn't mean that I wasn't really happy when I got my

Speaker:

first permanent contract in 2021.

Speaker:

And what was your first permanent contract?

Speaker:

in 2020 then when I didn't want to work on, preventing sexualized abuse anymore,

Speaker:

another friend of mine said, oh, there's a maternity cover at the University

Speaker:

of Graz to work with researchers.

Speaker:

And then I thought, oh, that's going to be very traumatic.

Speaker:

I think I do that

Speaker:

Going back into the university.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

I'm not sure if I've, resolved everything from the last, since 2016, but I did

Speaker:

it anyway and did that job interview.

Speaker:

They are still, my colleagues are still fondly remembering, when they interviewed

Speaker:

me that I said, I cannot work on a Friday, because that's when I get massages.

Speaker:

So take it or leave it.

Speaker:

And, sadly, I now have to work on Fridays because I'm much better.

Speaker:

I have 40 hours now.

Speaker:

But, they nevertheless, took this maternity cover and it was working

Speaker:

with, doctoral researchers and then.

Speaker:

And, actually already at the end of this year, the vice rector for Research, who

Speaker:

is now the president of the Austrian Science Fund, who we were working for, he

Speaker:

wanted to do something for postdoctoral researchers and then we started a needs

Speaker:

assessment and, talking to a third of all the postdocs, the university had.

Speaker:

And then together with him very closely, developing measures.

Speaker:

And by the time he got the call to become the president of the Austrian Science

Speaker:

Fund, that was all basically prepared.

Speaker:

And, someone needed to give me a permanent job.

Speaker:

they did it.

Speaker:

And, since then, since 2021, end of 2021, I've I had the joy for 40

Speaker:

hours a week on a permanent contract to build up this postdoc office.

Speaker:

And now five years, no.

Speaker:

Three, four years later, we established a new unit that now houses the doctoral

Speaker:

researcher services, the postdoc office, and is also developing,

Speaker:

services for mid-career researchers.

Speaker:

And, I'm now its boss.

Speaker:

So lovely.

Speaker:

I'm very happy.

Speaker:

Oh, that's, just a lovely journey.

Speaker:

The holding your boundaries, the way things work out, the way that you can

Speaker:

bring through the skills and knowledge and expertise that you have and pointing

Speaker:

out along the way, like the critical things that we often don't think

Speaker:

about, that the conversations that we have with people are so important.

Speaker:

So no one told you the why because we just assume that everyone knows

Speaker:

because it's just, it just is the environment that we are in.

Speaker:

So not understanding why some of the things were being

Speaker:

asked or, suggested or pushed.

Speaker:

And then the messages that you were getting were, well of course you've got to

Speaker:

work weekends and makes me really reflect about how how we are messaging, And how

Speaker:

explicit we are with people to explain.

Speaker:

And also like how many times as a researcher working in a university

Speaker:

did someone say to you, so nice that you are here with your skills.

Speaker:

Not so many times.

Speaker:

And wouldn't that be wonderful if your professor said to you so nice that you

Speaker:

are here with your skills, your skills.

Speaker:

I have this card still here, above me and that I got when I came to Luneburg

Speaker:

in Germany and that Christmas card where it has that, we are so happy

Speaker:

that you're here with your skills.

Speaker:

And it's, even though it's a Christian Christmas card for some reason because

Speaker:

you had it lying around, I, I still have it because it's so important to me

Speaker:

that I was able to make the switch and that I was able to meet these people

Speaker:

who were healing me a little bit.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And it's such a small gesture and look at the impact that it's still having.

Speaker:

The fact that you do have the card there, that it's something that you remember and

Speaker:

when you were talking about it, the way your face softened and lit up as well.

Speaker:

just remembering, I don't know, it's almost like you were re-basking in

Speaker:

the glow of that appreciation, such a small gesture, but so impactful.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And with these messages, I try not to stress any researchers out in my job now.

Speaker:

I don't know how good I am at that, but I, try to tell stories in my workshops about

Speaker:

people who make it work, 20 hours a week.

Speaker:

And many different stories of all the people I know who, because I'm now seeking

Speaker:

out these people who made their own path, that is not like this story of you have to

Speaker:

work weekends and you cannot have friends.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So I'm always looking for the stories and then I'm telling them to people.

Speaker:

And I can also see the impact of this because I invited this friend

Speaker:

of mine, for example, who has always.

Speaker:

Worked in the same university and now has a permanent job there.

Speaker:

And she comes from a, Gastarbeiter, or rather not a

Speaker:

Gastarbeiter, a refugee family.

Speaker:

And, I invited her to tell this to all of our postdocs, at one of our, annual event.

Speaker:

And she actually inspired one person who also cannot be mobile because he cares for

Speaker:

his parents, to ask for a permanent job.

Speaker:

And he now has one.

Speaker:

That's probably wasn't the only thing that inspired him.

Speaker:

Probably it's his, skills and research brilliance and,

Speaker:

and his negotiation, prowess.

Speaker:

but I, saw he was talking to her afterwards, and so I'm,

Speaker:

thinking, yeah, that's a little bit my contribution and yeah.

Speaker:

So when you talk about fun and kind academia, is that your

Speaker:

personal mission in your role?

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

That fun and kind.

Speaker:

That's the kindness aspect of it.

Speaker:

That will be more the be kind to yourself,

Speaker:

and seek out the people who are also collaborative and, solidarity.

Speaker:

That was always what I tried, when I was working in academia, I did lots

Speaker:

of peer group work, so this peer group for qualitative methods, alumni

Speaker:

work, everything that brought people together, female accountability groups.

Speaker:

So I don't really like accountability, so I didn't work very much, but just

Speaker:

the female solidarity parts of it.

Speaker:

And, I tried that as far as I could take it.

Speaker:

Basically, this is solidarity and I, found it ends where someone needs to

Speaker:

fulfill things, for their contracts.

Speaker:

and then they can't collaborate anymore because they need, people on a

Speaker:

higher level to collaborate with them.

Speaker:

Or other, yeah, actual instances of power abuse, for example, I had a

Speaker:

boss once who made me write a very bad review, of someone who she didn't like.

Speaker:

And that was my very first publication ever.

Speaker:

She just said, put in this one sentence, and I just put it in

Speaker:

and, I obviously feel bad about it.

Speaker:

It was like this wasn't very original or something, so it

Speaker:

wasn't the worst thing ever.

Speaker:

But obviously, an instance of power abuse because I was in my first job ever.

Speaker:

not going to go into more details about this.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

But.

Speaker:

Many times actually, I cried when experienced that other people aren't

Speaker:

as or cannot be or have been formed in such a way by the system that

Speaker:

they cannot be collaborative and they cannot be, kind to each other.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And now, it's not that I'm taking revenge on the system, it's basically just that

Speaker:

I'm taking a solution focused approach and drawing out all the things where

Speaker:

people are nice to each other and where structures are working so that they can

Speaker:

be nice to each other where they are establishing new structures, together.

Speaker:

And there are so many instances of this anyway.

Speaker:

When we talk, the postdoc office does a lot of influencing, on LinkedIn and in

Speaker:

our workshops and public discussions and through speakers and so on, we always try

Speaker:

to acknowledge the, harming structures or the bad things that are happening, but

Speaker:

also, and that they are structural, but also the solutions that individuals find.

Speaker:

And that actually things like CoARA, big, movements where that are aimed

Speaker:

at changing the structures and it's not, everything is not doom and gloom

Speaker:

and there are so many people who, get together and, form movements.

Speaker:

yes.

Speaker:

Yeah, that's so just fun and kind.

Speaker:

It's just focusing on the Yeah.

Speaker:

The nicer things that make it better for us.

Speaker:

Just for people who may not be familiar with it CoARA is an initiative at

Speaker:

European level, and it's the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment.

Speaker:

And they're part of really trying to shift some of the structural issues.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Reforming what we acknowledge as a research, good research performance.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So where doing things for your university also counts and doing

Speaker:

things for the students also counts.

Speaker:

And doing things for society also counts as much as an impact factor and moving

Speaker:

away from that impact factor as to not permit too much scientific fraud as well.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So that's my understanding of it.

Speaker:

And also the.

Speaker:

It's very good at acknowledging the collegiality aspect and the fact that

Speaker:

there, It's not the lone researcher, but there are multiple roles that

Speaker:

contribute to research outputs.

Speaker:

Now obviously now I work for the Rectorate of a University,

Speaker:

I also can't go around and say you working at the university is shit or working in

Speaker:

academia is shit, because first of all, I don't believe working at the University of

Speaker:

Graz is shit because I enjoy quite a lot.

Speaker:

I know a lot of people who like it a lot, but it wouldn't be, good, neither

Speaker:

for my mission nor for my employer if I told everyone how harmful academia is.

Speaker:

Because I want the people to thrive in academia and I

Speaker:

want them to change academia.

Speaker:

And I, all of these, for example, female mathematicians at our department, despite

Speaker:

the fact that they are all basically competing with each other, you never

Speaker:

notice that because they just are so supportive, mentoring each other,

Speaker:

mentoring people in other countries, putting up, lunch, clubs, and, everything.

Speaker:

And.

Speaker:

So these are actually the people who are going in the

Speaker:

university committees and so on.

Speaker:

So they make it an a livable experience.

Speaker:

but there is a tension between speaking for an employer, wanting your employer

Speaker:

to recruit great people who also benefit the collegial aspect of our

Speaker:

togetherness here at the university.

Speaker:

And to be seen by people as just saying, everything is

Speaker:

great and we're so collegial.

Speaker:

And I think I, as an anthropologist, I know, everything is power relations

Speaker:

and everything is, structure, shapes how we interact and And there's

Speaker:

many bad things going on in short.

Speaker:

But I also believe we have agency to shape it, and I want people

Speaker:

to get together to, to, yeah.

Speaker:

So what do you think, you talked about solutions focus, like there

Speaker:

are structural issues and I think that one of the things about the

Speaker:

anthropology background is sitting in the middle of all that messy complexity.

Speaker:

So the structural issues and you talked about solutions focused and the agency.

Speaker:

So what do you think, that either you promote through your office or that you

Speaker:

do, in your work, what are the key areas of agency that you think make a difference

Speaker:

or maybe some examples of initiatives?

Speaker:

I've, had to accept that I have limited scope in my work, so I also have

Speaker:

to rely on the people I work with.

Speaker:

So the postdocs themselves to do things for themselves.

Speaker:

And I can't change, many of the structures which they would want to change.

Speaker:

For example, if

Speaker:

things that postdocs said in 20 20, 20 21 that they want changed, still

Speaker:

haven't changed because some of them are at the faculty level, for example,

Speaker:

where I have limited influence.

Speaker:

A very wise professor who's now a professor once told me, you can also rely

Speaker:

on the people to fight for themselves.

Speaker:

And that helped me a lot.

Speaker:

She's one of the creators of the network against power abuse in academia.

Speaker:

So she has had the experience from a PhD candidate onwards that she was

Speaker:

able to actually establish structures that make academia better place.

Speaker:

So she, found PhD Net at Max Planck, and then she found that this network

Speaker:

against power abuse and she now has about a hundred ERC grants.

Speaker:

I'm, over exaggerating.

Speaker:

anyway, she is brilliant.

Speaker:

And that after three years of the postdoc office where I saw, people,

Speaker:

the university still, people still come to me with the same complaints.

Speaker:

There's not much transparency.

Speaker:

Information isn't being passed down to me.

Speaker:

I'm actually being prohibited from going into some committees.

Speaker:

I don't actually know how things work.

Speaker:

Yeah, it was a good conversation with her to know.

Speaker:

That's not talking about any initiatives right now.

Speaker:

That's just talking about how I survive in my job, in which people, yeah

Speaker:

come to me with problems every day.

Speaker:

The problems that not necessarily stem from our university either,

Speaker:

that they had in their last university, and it challenges them

Speaker:

still, in their daily work here.

Speaker:

So I try to give competent advice.

Speaker:

For example, if you have, experienced power abuse in a former job, I can now

Speaker:

tell you five people who you can talk to.

Speaker:

So that's how I work.

Speaker:

by being accessible for all the bad things that can happen to you.

Speaker:

And then knowing how, who to connect you with and knowing, having insider

Speaker:

knowledge basically into many different things, many different parts of the

Speaker:

researcher experience and then relying on people to do it themselves basically.

Speaker:

And asking them to check back in with me and report, but go out

Speaker:

and seek the solutions themselves.

Speaker:

And we have also, we have a conflict resolution contact point.

Speaker:

So the university has many structures you can send people to.

Speaker:

There also know many structures outside the university.

Speaker:

That's now for conflict, but, The researcher experience

Speaker:

is much more than conflicts.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And I try to make myself as knowledgeable in all the things like publishing or

Speaker:

career development or anything else.

Speaker:

And in terms of, programs, we used to run a peer mentoring program.

Speaker:

Now we have a workshop where you learn how to give collegial advice

Speaker:

and support in a structured manner.

Speaker:

We have a fiasco fest, which celebrates failure and creates

Speaker:

(lovely) this community.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

It's really funny that a psychology professor thought it up and came to me

Speaker:

when we started the Postoc office and then we made the concept, the two of us.

Speaker:

And it's, people sharing their tops and flops and looking at the

Speaker:

top and flop CVs that they have.

Speaker:

And then, just drinking a little bit afterwards, as far as they're comfortable

Speaker:

and then burning all of their fiascos.

Speaker:

That's the short of it, but she gives obviously competent psychological

Speaker:

advice on how to prepare yourself for the inevitable setbacks that

Speaker:

will be part of any career basically.

Speaker:

And that serves the purpose of also getting people together and talking

Speaker:

in a way that they don't usually talk.

Speaker:

Or maybe they don't have so many, areas in their own workplace where they, can

Speaker:

open up and can see, oh, okay, someone else is having exactly the same issues.

Speaker:

And that also happens at the writing retreat.

Speaker:

We have a yearly retreat for three days where, which includes,

Speaker:

time in the sauna if you want.

Speaker:

So someone told me once, that's the first experience of academic sisterhood

Speaker:

that they, they had in the sauna at the writing retreat with other researchers

Speaker:

that they've never seen before.

Speaker:

And but the writing retreat is actually like structured writing time with

Speaker:

a writing facilitator where you get three meals a day and your schedule

Speaker:

is being, taken care of for you.

Speaker:

And she just tells you when to write and she helps you with

Speaker:

any, issues that come, across.

Speaker:

And she makes you go out to exercise or to take a walk and, Afterwards, it's

Speaker:

just, holidaying in this resort basically.

Speaker:

And these are all things that serve to form the community and people

Speaker:

will then get in WhatsApp groups together or just see each other again

Speaker:

and have seen each other previously.

Speaker:

And so we work a lot with that researcher wellbeing, through

Speaker:

researcher wellbeing, and community, having paperwork on their careers.

Speaker:

So I don't go around and hit them on the head with the career

Speaker:

board or the career planning.

Speaker:

I just try to create spaces that are first educational for them or hit any

Speaker:

spot that they like needing to finish a paper or needing to know how to perform

Speaker:

in the interview for a professorship, but also do it with nice people.

Speaker:

And that's the approach basically.

Speaker:

I think I said three main popular.

Speaker:

Popular programs.

Speaker:

Can I dig in on a couple of those?

Speaker:

I love the Fiasco Fest.

Speaker:

That's brilliant.

Speaker:

And the writing retreat.

Speaker:

You said at the beginning you, you have a program where you talk to

Speaker:

people about, you're not doing the peer mentoring anymore, but you're

Speaker:

Training people in how to do the collegial advice.

Speaker:

Could you say a little bit more about that?

Speaker:

yes, we, what could be a tip or a trick for that?

Speaker:

Ah, okay.

Speaker:

the genesis of that is that for three years we had peer groups, so

Speaker:

they spent a year with each other.

Speaker:

And that's also our approach.

Speaker:

We believe the community already has knowledge and resources, and they

Speaker:

just need to be brought together.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

they don't necessarily need to be taught anything.

Speaker:

they just need to connect with each other to share that.

Speaker:

And there is a model that's called Kollegiale Fallberatung.

Speaker:

In French Canadian.

Speaker:

Collegial development collegial and in English action items I think or something.

Speaker:

Action learning sets.

Speaker:

Learning.

Speaker:

Yes, exactly.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So it's all basically the same concept.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And at the start of each peer group, they were taught this,

Speaker:

method by a trainer, practically.

Speaker:

And then that's what they would do in their sessions.

Speaker:

And now these peer groups.

Speaker:

So we have 350 postdocs and eight or so always applied for this.

Speaker:

And everyone from the other postdoc offices around the world always

Speaker:

said, wow, that's impressive.

Speaker:

No one applied.

Speaker:

Wouldn't apply for something like this at our university.

Speaker:

But now it seems to be something we need to wait for another two years

Speaker:

until we have the interest again.

Speaker:

So we had only four people apply this year.

Speaker:

So what we offer now, is just methods training.

Speaker:

how to sit together, raise an issue, and then, in a specific agenda,

Speaker:

go through the issues where the group develop solutions for you.

Speaker:

You are not allowed to say anything, and then you, allowed to react to

Speaker:

what they said, and then you could together maybe map out the plan for

Speaker:

you to actually take action and then.

Speaker:

A week later, a month later, two months later, you meet the group again, and then

Speaker:

you, we can report how that issue went.

Speaker:

And we also use this for supervisor training.

Speaker:

So we have a group that's called Supervisor Network, and some of them

Speaker:

were previous graduates of this peer mentoring and some are just, rather

Speaker:

experienced university professors.

Speaker:

And they got all together to, discuss critical situations

Speaker:

from their supervisory practice.

Speaker:

And I, saw in that, they presented it this year in April, that

Speaker:

doing this for three years has influenced the university somehow.

Speaker:

Nice.

Speaker:

Towards more supportive supervisory practices or dealing with situations

Speaker:

more, more constructively.

Speaker:

Just people have caught on to this idea of you can do something with a peer group.

Speaker:

it's, there is a platform where you can find these peers and there

Speaker:

are tools and it's an acknowledged concept now in the method, in

Speaker:

the professional form of getting together and improving our practice.

Speaker:

Basically.

Speaker:

And this is now a group made out of senior postdocs and established professors and,

Speaker:

I hope with this new method training that also goes into all the faculties,

Speaker:

or all other universities where the people might go to and they, yes, they

Speaker:

have some topic be supervision, be it, I don't know, just career decisions

Speaker:

and then they can say, there's actually structured methods and we could meet

Speaker:

once a month or something like that.

Speaker:

And, so yeah, I think that has potential.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And it's, that's obviously was not me.

Speaker:

I wasn't the first person who thought of the,

Speaker:

i'm actually an action learning set facilitator, trained.

Speaker:

Oh.

Speaker:

And it's brilliant to hear how the transition from the more structured, you

Speaker:

meet, depending on what model you use, six sessions and there's the commitment.

Speaker:

And this sounds like it's taking the principles and working with the reality

Speaker:

of people being busy and letting them interpret the principles to meet when

Speaker:

they want and as often as they want.

Speaker:

That's brilliant.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Maybe can you say it briefly about the action learning sets, because

Speaker:

it's probably sounding better when you, when it comes from you.

Speaker:

It is a peer mentoring process, isn't it?

Speaker:

And often the way it's more traditionally set up, and I always

Speaker:

had the question in my mind about how well it works in academia to get

Speaker:

the commitment for people to turn up.

Speaker:

But normally you have five or six people, you have a facilitator who will role

Speaker:

model how to structure a conversation.

Speaker:

The people agree to get together in regular period, could be

Speaker:

once a month or whatever, maybe for about five or six meetings.

Speaker:

At the beginning, usually everyone goes around and just says what they might

Speaker:

talk about, what could be an issue.

Speaker:

And then the group decides which one they focus on.

Speaker:

And then exactly the process that you talked about.

Speaker:

Although what I was taught was more about instead of the group

Speaker:

coming up with solutions, the group coming up with the questions to

Speaker:

help the person thinks through.

Speaker:

And then at the end they can bring in some ideas or solutions themselves.

Speaker:

So anyway,

Speaker:

Yeah, that was what I also understood in Yeah.

Speaker:

Also that element where you are not allowed to say anything.

Speaker:

Is that also in your action learning sets?

Speaker:

Where the person who brings the problem, they are responding to the questions and

Speaker:

they're not listening to other people just talking about their own problems.

Speaker:

There's a round where you say, does anyone want to bring a case for today?

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Basically, yeah.

Speaker:

And then you bring the case and then people can ask many questions just if

Speaker:

they haven't understood and then they discuss without you involving yourself.

Speaker:

So in that, the way that I have learned it, not the actual learning

Speaker:

set, but the colleague, yeah.

Speaker:

You sit there for about 10 minutes, 15 minutes listening to the

Speaker:

people expound on what you do.

Speaker:

And also, Geraldine we did that, in our ethno psychoanalysis supervisory

Speaker:

group that we had for field work, which was the Balint model.

Speaker:

Do you know the Balint model from psychotherapy?

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

I thinks psychotherapists get together, to reflect on critical cases from

Speaker:

their work in the Balint group model.

Speaker:

We did that when I was a PhD candidate or when I did field work still.

Speaker:

We had a group with a supervisor who was psychoanalytically trained

Speaker:

and also an anthropologist, and someone said, I had this interview.

Speaker:

I'm now going to tell you about it.

Speaker:

Or, I had this situation in my field work, and then the people are discussing it.

Speaker:

On the basis of emotions that this brought up.

Speaker:

So it was a way to make visible relationships in field work through

Speaker:

the emotions of other people who have just heard what you were talking.

Speaker:

And you could then see something happening in this group, that you

Speaker:

might have realized was present as a topic in your field work or was a

Speaker:

relationship issue in your field work.

Speaker:

And, this is what I did when I was a researcher and it's, not dissimilar

Speaker:

say to what the peer groups are doing, but yeah, we have a facilitator come in

Speaker:

who does this, training in the methods.

Speaker:

I enjoy that element where other people are talking about your

Speaker:

problem and you can lean back.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

See, ah, that's interesting.

Speaker:

Hadn't thought about that angle.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

The other thing that I'd love to hear more about, you talked about the researchers'

Speaker:

wellbeing and, community building and that was a point you brought up at the

Speaker:

end and some education around that.

Speaker:

So what are some of the key planks of that one?

Speaker:

Oh, that's just, that was just to say that I, don't say we are a career center.

Speaker:

We're, we are a center that strives to create, good environments for researchers

Speaker:

to feel well at work, basically.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

So the mission isn't foremost to develop your career.

Speaker:

The mission is to have a good working environment and feel well in yourself.

Speaker:

And from that then, stems everything else basically.

Speaker:

The concept would be take care of yourself first, and, look at your

Speaker:

resources, have a focus on what feeds you, what, nurtures you.

Speaker:

Yesterday I heard someone saying, Genuss.

Speaker:

What's the word in English?

Speaker:

Joy?

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

But more you know, yeah.

Speaker:

this savor.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Savoring.

Speaker:

Savoring.

Speaker:

And, that, that's my approach when I get together with people in coaching.

Speaker:

So that's my approach.

Speaker:

We always have food for people, and in fact, people who live our

Speaker:

university say to me, thanks, Johanna, for all the free food.

Speaker:

And, but we never do an event that has not any benefit for your career.

Speaker:

So everything is informational and everything is networking

Speaker:

and everything is, actually very important information for you.

Speaker:

But, it's around eating.

Speaker:

It's around being in nature.

Speaker:

It's around, Asking yourself, how long hours can I work or what, do I

Speaker:

do to recharge and, where are other people who can help me recharge?

Speaker:

And, what's my community and what are all the supportive environments I can map

Speaker:

out and how can I put them into place?

Speaker:

And how can I defend those boundaries when once I have identified what

Speaker:

feeds me, how can I maintain that and do I have to, and then does it

Speaker:

become too stressful to maintain it?

Speaker:

And then can I just let it go?

Speaker:

Or yeah, what can I let go of that stresses me.

Speaker:

yeah.

Speaker:

Nice.

Speaker:

So just in wrapping, what feeds you?

Speaker:

I like to go to the sauna.

Speaker:

That's my, actually my main hobby in my life.

Speaker:

But what also feeds me is having, this very stable job where I have lots

Speaker:

of, space for creativity and lots of agency, and we have lovely leadership,

Speaker:

which is lets us do what we want because they always see it's good.

Speaker:

And the colleagues are really funny.

Speaker:

And I used to be often very alone because I was the only PhD at my

Speaker:

department then I was the only postdoc.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So all these peer groups I made were also because I'm lonely and now

Speaker:

there's people who are very aligned with what I do and from whom I could

Speaker:

learn a lot because they were already there for a long time when I came.

Speaker:

And they are also really funny.

Speaker:

And so that, that feeds me, going to work, being able to set my own agenda

Speaker:

and being together with people who are yeah, just, nice and competent and,

Speaker:

and like taking obviously evenings, weekends sauna time, holidays, eating.

Speaker:

Oh, that sounds brilliant.

Speaker:

That sounds brilliant.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Is there anything that you want to say that you wanted

Speaker:

to say that we haven't said?

Speaker:

No, I made a few notes of talking points.

Speaker:

maybe just as an explainer of why I didn't know how academia works is

Speaker:

because I didn't know anyone who worked in academia and I still have very

Speaker:

little friends who work in academia.

Speaker:

And my family are in the Austrian railways or in the Austrian

Speaker:

steel works historically.

Speaker:

they were obviously liked public infrastructure but

Speaker:

weren't academically inclined.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So I'm also conscious of that.

Speaker:

I have to explain things now because not everyone has the same background and.

Speaker:

Exactly.

Speaker:

I'm also, yeah.

Speaker:

Sometimes puzzling how I am now despite the fact that I, suffered because I

Speaker:

didn't know the rules, I can now translate these rules, make them more transparent.

Speaker:

But I'm still in an environment that has many hierarchies because

Speaker:

yeah, I'm now support staff.

Speaker:

And we like to say we feed the mission of research and not only researchers as

Speaker:

people, but often it's also noticeable that there are hierarchies and sometimes,

Speaker:

the postdocs I work with are all brilliant and really appreciative as other PhD

Speaker:

candidates and many professors as well.

Speaker:

But sometimes you can notice, these hierarchies a little bit.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

University leadership, not much.

Speaker:

They don't seem to have any sort of, a need to, claim their status.

Speaker:

They're very,

Speaker:

They already firmly stand in it.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

As well.

Speaker:

That wasn't a very good ending word.

Speaker:

But just to say, not everything is happy all the time.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

But that we do have a lot of agency.

Speaker:

You've pointed to the Yeah.

Speaker:

The multiple ways that we do have agency.

Speaker:

The ways that we can contribute to one another by not assuming people

Speaker:

know, by explaining, by reaching out, by saying we appreciate people.

Speaker:

And, also the power of community.

Speaker:

So much of what you've talked about is connecting people and, the wisdom and

Speaker:

the expertise we all have and share whether it's of our fiascos, of our flops

Speaker:

and tops or whatever, like we, yeah.

Speaker:

And on your own terms, on your own terms, as much as you can,

Speaker:

on your own terms.

Speaker:

That's a great, finish.

Speaker:

So thank you so much.

Speaker:

This has just been wonderful Johanna.

Speaker:

I really appreciate your time.

Speaker:

Thanks Geraldine.

Speaker:

Yes, that super that you attentively listen to me for an hour and gave

Speaker:

me the space to talk about myself.

Speaker:

That's also feeding me.

Speaker:

Oh, that's good.

Speaker:

Thank you.

Speaker:

You can find the summary notes, a transcript and related links for this

Speaker:

podcast on www.changingacademiclife.com.

Speaker:

You can also subscribe to Changing Academic Life on iTunes, Spotify.

Speaker:

And I'm really hoping that we can widen the conversation about how

Speaker:

we can do academia differently.

Speaker:

And you can contribute to this by rating the podcast and also giving feedback.

Speaker:

And if something connected with you, please consider sharing this

Speaker:

podcast with your colleagues.

Speaker:

Together we can make change happen.

Show artwork for Changing Academic Life

About the Podcast

Changing Academic Life
What can we do, individually and collectively, to change academic life to be more sustainable, collaborative and effective? This podcast series offers long-form conversations with academics and thought leaders who share stories and insights, as well as bite-size musings on specific topics drawing on literature and personal experience.
For more information go to https://changingacademiclife.com
Also see https://geraldinefitzpatrick.com to leave a comment.
NOTE: this is an interim site and missing transcripts for the older podcasts. Please contact me to request specific transcripts in the meanwhile.

About your host

Profile picture for Geraldine Fitzpatrick

Geraldine Fitzpatrick

Geraldine Fitzpatrick (Geri Fitz), is an awarded Professor i.R. at TU Wien, with degrees in Informatics, and in Positive Psychology and Coaching Psychology, after a prior career as a nurse/midwife. She has International experience working in academic, research, industry and clinical settings. She is a sought-after facilitator, speaker, trainer and coach who cares about creating environments in which people can thrive, enabling individual growth, and creating collegial collaborative cultures. She works with academics and professionals at all levels, from senior academic leaders, to mid and early career researchers, to PhD students. She is also a mentor for academics and has been/is on various Faculty evaluation panels and various International Advisory Boards. An example of a course is the Academic Leadership Development Course for Informatics Europe, run in conjunction with Austen Rainer, Queens Uni Belfast. She also offers bespoke courses.